Design that works, with or without a screen

Design curriculum
that stands on its own.

is the curriculum design studio that enforces backwards design from the first objective you write. Standards to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to lessons. The result is a curriculum that works whether it's delivered on a screen, on paper, or on a whiteboard.

Curriculum MapCross-Course Alignment
ENG 101
ENG 201
ENG 301
ENG 410
Critical Analysis
3
2
4
3
Research Methods
1
3
2
4
Written Comm.
4
3
3
2
Digital Literacy
1
2
3
Ethical Reasoning
1
2
4
English Dept.5 Standards4 Courses

When the screens go away,
what's left?

Schools are pulling back devices, banning phones, and watching students outsource thinking to AI. The curriculum that survives this shift is the one that was well-designed in the first place: clear objectives, purposeful assessments, and lessons that don't depend on a platform to be effective. The problem isn't technology. It's that most curriculum was never designed with enough rigor to stand without it. builds that rigor in from the start.

Curriculum Mapping

See which standards every course covers and where the gaps are. A cross-course heatmap shows depth of coverage by department, division, or your entire institution. No more post-hoc spreadsheets for accreditation.

Standards Alignment

Import accreditation frameworks, state standards, or your own institutional outcomes. Align course objectives upward to standards and downward to lessons. The full vertical map, always visible.

Objectives-First Design

A three-tier alignment hierarchy — standards and outcomes at the top, course objectives in the middle, unit and lesson objectives at the bottom — aligned to QM K-12 rubric requirements. DOK levels are first-class throughout: every objective, every assessment item, every alignment report. Backward design isn't a suggestion. It's the architecture.

Structured Course Authoring

Units, lessons, assessments, and materials in a coherent structure. Course objectives are distinct from unit learning objectives — because QM requires it and because they serve different purposes. Every piece links to its parent objective and traces back to a standard.

AI-Drafted Assessments

Generate criterion-referenced items tied to specific objectives and cognitive levels, grounded in your course materials. AI accelerates the drafting while your team ensures validity.

Visible Alignment Trail

Every course produces a print-ready map from standards through objectives, lessons, and assessments. Verify at a glance that your curriculum teaches and measures what it claims.

From standards
to the classroom

enforces the design discipline that makes curriculum defensible: objectives before lessons, assessments before activities, alignment verified at every step. The output goes wherever your teachers teach.

1

Set Your Standards

Import accreditation frameworks, state standards, or define your own institutional outcomes. These become the north star for every course.

2

Build Aligned Courses

Author objectives, units, lessons, and assessments, each explicitly mapped to the standards above. Alignment is visible as you work, not verified after.

3

Map the Curriculum

See cross-course coverage in a heatmap. Identify gaps, redundancies, and progression across departments. This is the view accreditation reviewers wish you had.

4

Deliver However You Teach

Push to Canvas with one click. Export a Common Cartridge for any LMS. Or print a polished course guide for the teacher's binder. The design is the product. Delivery is just the last mile.

See your whole curriculum.
In one view.

Most tools show you one course at a time. shows you every course in your department, or your entire school, mapped against the standards that matter. Gaps become obvious. Redundancies surface. Progression across courses becomes intentional, not accidental.

  • Cross-course heatmap with standards as rows, courses as columns, and depth of coverage as shading
  • Filter by department, division, or standards framework to focus your view
  • Drill into any cell to see exactly which objectives and lessons address each standard
  • Per-course alignment trail: standards → objectives → lessons → assessments, print-ready
  • Built for accreditation: the coverage map your reviewers wish you already had
Alignment Cascade
StandardInstitutional
Students will demonstrate critical thinking through analysis of complex texts and arguments.
ENG101.01AnalyzeENG 101
Analyze how an author's choices structure a text and contribute to its meaning
LessonUnit 2: Rhetorical Analysis Workshop
QuizRhetorical Analysis Assessment (4 items)
ENG201.03EvaluateENG 201
Evaluate the effectiveness of argumentative strategies in academic writing
Generated Assessment
Multiple ChoiceAnalyze4 pts
Which rhetorical strategy does the author primarily use in paragraphs 3–5 to advance the claim that urban green spaces reduce inequality?
  • Appeal to emotion
  • Evidence-based reasoning
  • Anecdotal testimony
  • Appeal to authority
MatchingApply6 pts
Match each literary device to the excerpt from the passage in which it appears.
EssayEvaluate10 pts
Evaluate the author's argument. Identify at least two strengths and one limitation, using textual evidence.

AI builds the assessment.
Students can't shortcut it.

Generic questions get generic AI answers. That's why every item generated in is criterion-referenced to a specific objective, grounded in your actual course materials, and targeted at a defined cognitive level. These aren't questions students can paste into ChatGPT. They're questions that require engagement with the material your teachers actually taught.

  • Seven question types: MC, True/False, Multiple Answer, Matching, Ordering, Categorization, Essay
  • Cognitive-level targeting: DOK 1 tests recall, DOK 3 demands analysis of specific course content
  • Source-grounded in your materials — not searchable, not generic, not AI-bypassable
  • Inline editing and targeted regeneration: "harder," "fix distractors," or custom feedback
  • Export as print-ready documents, Canvas New Quizzes, or QTI for any LMS

Captivate is Photoshop. Canvas is the printer.
Where's InDesign?

Your team already has tools for building interactive content — Captivate, Storyline, Rise. And you have tools for delivering it — Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard. What's been missing is the composition layer: the place where objectives, lessons, assessments, and standards come together into a coherent, aligned course before it ships to the LMS or the printer. is that layer. Your authoring tools stay in the picture. Your LMS stays in the picture. is the design studio that was missing between them.

The design is the product. Delivery is the last mile.

Have an LMS? Push directly to Canvas or export a Common Cartridge for Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, or Schoology. No LMS? Your curriculum still works — print professional course packets, test masters with answer keys, and alignment maps that live in a binder or on a principal's desk.

Canvas: Native API Sync
Assignment Groups
Weighted Grading
Modules
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
New Quizzes
Discussions
Outcomes
Syllabus
Common Cartridge: Any IMS-Compliant LMS
Modules & Structure
Pages & Lessons
Assignments
Syllabus
QTI Assessments
Print & PDF: No LMS RequiredComing Soon
Course Packet
Lesson Plans
Test Masters
Answer Keys
Syllabus
Course Map

I've sat in your seat.
This is the tool I needed.

After nearly 30 years as a teacher, technologist, learning designer, Canvas admin, and QM Master Reviewer, I've determined that the hardest problem in curriculum isn't writing good lessons. It's maintaining top-to-bottom alignment — standards to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to lessons — across every course in a school. Without intentionality from the start, and without the ability to see alignment as you design, real coverage is all but impossible. You end up building courses in isolation and retrofitting alignment maps for review.

I've reviewed hundreds of courses against Quality Matters rubrics. I know exactly where alignment breaks down: where course objectives and unit objectives blur together, where DOK levels become afterthoughts, where standards coverage is claimed but not evidenced. is built to prevent those failures structurally, not with checklists after the fact.

If you've ever scrambled to produce a curriculum map for accreditation, or wondered whether your sophomore-level courses actually reinforce what was introduced in the freshman year, you know exactly why this exists.

Joseph Barr
Instructional Designer · Canvas Admin · QM Master Reviewer · Teacher & Founder

Ready to design curriculum
that stands on its own?

Tell me about your school, your standards, and where curriculum quality breaks down. I'll show you how builds the rigor in.

Get in Touch