Curriculum alignment for schools and colleges

Design a whole program of study, course by course.

Most tools handle one course at a time. handles the program: standards and outcomes, courses, objectives, assessments, and lessons in one model, sequenced across departments and levels. You align as you write, so the coverage evidence already exists when a reviewer asks for it.

Alignment MapCross-Course Coverage
Intro
Core
Adv
Capstone
Evidence & Reasoning
I
D
D
M
Quantitative Analysis
I
I
D
D
Systems Thinking
-
I
D
M
Written Communication
-
I
I
D
Ethical Practice
I
D
M
M
Program sequence5 program outcomesI → D → M progression

Alignment is the part that makes it a curriculum.

A course can be engaging and rigorous and still not be curriculum. What makes it curriculum is whether it moves learners toward what it was built to meet, whether that is a state standard, a program learning outcome, or an institutional outcome the whole degree shares. Engagement and rigor are not substitutes for that.

In you build those connections while you write, not in a review afterward. Standards and outcomes connect to objectives, objectives to assessments, assessments to the activities, materials, and media that teach them. The connections are stored with the course, so the coverage report is already written and you export it when someone asks.

One model, from standards
to lesson plans.

The same four steps whether you are mapping a K-12 course of study or a degree program. Nothing gets re-keyed between them.

1

Bring in your standards and outcomes

Import K-12 frameworks over CASE: NGSS, Common Core, state standards. Or bring what your institution already runs on: institutional and program learning outcomes, accreditor competencies, or a set you maintain yourself, loaded from a CSV or pulled out of a document by AI. Everything lands in outcome sets.

2

Map them to courses

Assign each standard or outcome to the courses that carry it, at Introduce, Develop, or Master depth. Gaps and progressions appear as you work, and the map exports to CSV or print.

3

Author the courses

Write course objectives, then unit or module objectives, then assessments and lessons. Each one links to the objective above it and traces back to the framework it came from.

4

Publish it

Push to Canvas with a pre-flight check that shows what will be overwritten before it is. Export Common Cartridge for any LMS. Or print the course documents for a binder.

The reporting is done before you need it.

Most institutions prepare for an accreditation visit by reconstructing alignment after the fact, rebuilding spreadsheets from memory before the reviewers arrive. When alignment is part of the authoring, the evidence accumulates as the courses get written. On review day, you export it.

Cross-Course Alignment Map

Every standard or outcome against every course at Introduce, Develop, or Master depth, filterable to gaps only. Exports to CSV or prints for the binder.

Standards Evidence Chain

Each standard or outcome traced through course and unit objectives to the assessments that measure it, exportable as a spreadsheet.

Course Health Score

Every course carries a 0–100 structural completeness score with a ranked list of gaps and a Fix shortcut for each.

Printed Course Packet

Course map, syllabus, lesson plans, and a standards trace appendix in one document, formatted for the review table.

The LMS is not a design tool.

Canvas, Moodle, Blackboard, and Brightspace deliver courses. None of them is built to compose one. Authoring tools make the content and the LMS ships it; is the layer in between, where objectives, lessons, assessments, and standards come together into a course before it goes anywhere. From there, print, PDF, and the LMS are all delivery paths out of the same source.

Print & PDF: course pack, binder, desk copy
→ Course Map
→ Lesson Plans
→ Test Masters
→ Answer Keys
→ Syllabus
→ Alignment Map
Canvas: native API sync
→ Modules & Structure
→ Assignment Groups
→ Weighted Grading
→ Pages & Lessons
→ Assignments
→ New Quizzes
→ Discussions
→ Outcomes & Rubrics
→ Syllabus
Common Cartridge: any IMS-compliant LMS
→ Modules & Structure
→ Pages & Lessons
→ Assignments
→ Syllabus
→ QTI Assessments

Four Levels of Objectives

Imported standards and outcomes, institutional and program alike, break down into course objectives, unit or module objectives, and lesson objectives. Each level links to the one above, so a lesson objective still reports up to the institutional outcome it serves.

DOK and Bloom’s on Every Objective

Course objectives, unit and module objectives, and generated items all carry a Depth of Knowledge level and a Bloom’s level, so cognitive rigor is tracked rather than assumed.

Publish to Any LMS

Native push to Canvas: modules, New Quizzes, rubrics, and more. Common Cartridge export covers Moodle, Blackboard, Brightspace, and Schoology. Print-ready documents when no LMS is needed.

AI-Generated Assessments

Criterion-referenced items tied to specific objectives and DOK levels, grounded in your course materials, so questions can’t be answered with a quick search.

Print-Ready Course Documents

Course maps, lesson plans, test masters, and alignment maps, formatted for a binder or a review table. No LMS required.

Align What You Already Teach

Align any course after the fact. AI proposes standard-to-content links, each backed by a verbatim quote from the course, and your team confirms or dismisses every one. Direct course import from Canvas and other LMSs is in development.

Generated Assessment
Multiple ChoiceDOK 34 pts
Which rhetorical strategy does the author primarily use in paragraphs 3–5 to advance the claim that urban green spaces reduce inequality?
  • Appeal to emotion
  • Evidence-based reasoning
  • Anecdotal testimony
  • Appeal to authority
MatchingDOK 26 pts
Match each literary device to the excerpt from the passage in which it appears.
EssayDOK 410 pts
Evaluate the author’s argument. Identify at least two strengths and one limitation, using textual evidence.

Every item tied to
a specific objective.

generates assessment items that are criterion-referenced to your objectives, targeted at a specific DOK level, and grounded in your own course materials. Students have to engage with the content instead of looking up a fact they can search for.

  • ✓Seven question types: MC, True/False, Multiple Answer, Matching, Ordering, Categorization, Essay
  • ✓Each item is tagged with its DOK and Bloom’s level and aligned to a specific course objective
  • ✓Source-grounded: generated from your uploaded materials, not from the model’s training data
  • ✓You can adjust difficulty, rewrite distractors, and add custom feedback on any item
  • ✓AI-generated rubrics: criterion-referenced performance levels built from your objectives, pushed to Canvas or included in print documents
  • ✓Exports as Canvas New Quizzes, QTI for any LMS, or print-ready test masters with answer keys

The tool I’ve wanted
for a long time.

After almost 30 years as a teacher, learning designer, Canvas admin, and Quality Matters Master Reviewer, I’ve come to think the hardest problem in curriculum isn’t authoring a strong course, unit, or lesson. It’s holding the standards, courses, objectives, assessments, lessons together as a school’s program grows and evolves. That work deserves a real tool.

is built for curriculum teams who treat alignment as craft. Not as a checkbox for accreditation, not as a report generated under pressure but as the architecture of the work itself. It’s the studio I wanted to build in, through every course I’ve helped design and review.

Joseph Barr
Instructional Designer · Teacher · Canvas Admin · QM Master Reviewer & Founder

Let’s talk about
your curriculum.

Tell me about your school or college, your program of study, and what you want the next version of your curriculum to look like. I’ll show you how helps you build it, and what the evidence looks like when you’re done.

Get in Touch